5
$\begingroup$

A popular distance measure, cosine similarity/distance, is not a proper metric because it fails to satisfy one of the conditions (the triangle inequality). However, there is no disadvantage whatsoever in using it and it is used heavily in many applications.

Is the categorization of a distance measure as a metric useful at all?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Hi and welcome to crossvalidated. Your question seems a bit unclear, I can't understand what you are asking and what is your point of discussion. Could you explain it better? Thanks $\endgroup$
    – GGA
    Commented Feb 8, 2017 at 10:42
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ If you ask why we usually use distance functions that are metrics, the answer is simple: a metric on a space induces many topological properties which are useful and well studied. $\endgroup$
    – Łukasz Grad
    Commented Feb 8, 2017 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome! I've tried to clarify your q. a little. Perhaps it might also help to mention the kind of applications you have in mind. $\endgroup$
    – Scortchi ♦
    Commented Feb 8, 2017 at 11:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note that if "cosine distance" or "correlation distance" is defined as $d^2=1-s$, without ignoring the sign of cosine or correlation $s$, then $d$ is euclidean distance, therefore metric. $\endgroup$
    – ttnphns
    Commented Feb 8, 2017 at 11:42
  • $\begingroup$ Lukasz Grad, thanks for the comments. So if I understood it correctly there is no direct downside of using non-metric measure. $\endgroup$
    – mitbal
    Commented Feb 10, 2017 at 10:55

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.