2
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have data $x$ and $y$, where $x$ is a count and $y$ is continuous. I would like to predict $x$ from $y$.

Specifically, for my research question, $X$ can be viewed as being measured without error (it is fixed by design), whereas $Y$ is random.

Below is my data

$x$:  [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

$y$:  [1] 1.0000 1.8002 2.4383 2.9353 3.3641 3.6847 3.9578 4.1610 4.3139 4.4667

The above data come from a simulation that I have developed to generate asymptotic "accumulation" curves. Basically, my simulation randomly samples without replacement from a pool of distinct character labels and computes the mean across all individuals (represented by the $x$ data). For the above data there are 5 character labels. I want to see if I can recover all 5 distinct labels. Based on the above data, only 4.4667 labels have been recovered on average.

What I am looking for is a regression technique that I can apply to the kind of data that I have supplied.

Specifically, I would use the proposed regression method to answer a question such as "What is the value of $x$ for a corresponding $y$-value of $y$ = 5?" That is, in the context of my data, what $x$ is needed to observe exactly $y$ = 5 labels?

I am unaware of existing appropriate alternatives that could work in this setting besides inverse regression.

$\endgroup$
14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What are "nonlinear data"? Why do you say they "don't fit any parametric model"? Is $n$ known/fixed? Could each $x$ be considered the sum of $n$ independent dichotomous observations? Explaining what $x$ & $y$ are would probably help make your question a lot clearer. $\endgroup$
    – Scortchi
    Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 15:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You really need to tell us what x and y represents $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 16:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ With regard to the latest edit: is $x$ fixed by design? What's the sampling scheme? If you don't explain anything at all about what the data represent and how they were obtained how can a suitable regression model be suggested? $\endgroup$
    – Scortchi
    Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 20:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @whuber The "controversy" I speak of refers to predicting $x$ from $y$ using "classical" vs. inverse regression estimators. The literature by Brandon Greenwell is an excellent source here. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 21:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. Interestingly, the top hit in a Google search turned up Greenwell's investr package for R, which offers many different ways to carry out inverse regression! He refers to this as "classical and well-known," so it's hard to see where the controversy might be. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Oct 4, 2017 at 21:34

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.