0
$\begingroup$

I have an imbalanced dataset for predicting bankrutptcy using the logit algorithm. My sample has 2%(200) bankrupt firms. Unfortunately my prediction is worthless with an auroc of 0.52. On top of that using the imbalanced dataset does not even explain 1% of the dependent variable. Strikingly, using (random) balanced data prediction power is much higher.

My data has enough bankrupt firms and is a good approximation of the full population so i wonder whether or not it is wise to compensate for imbalances in my sample? And very interesting: what is the advantage and disadvantage of compensating for imbalances ?

I hope someone can help me out.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

You could try and tune the sensitivity and specificity to increase your accuracy: This post might help! How to select a threshold for logistic regression in case of imbalance in class distribution

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.