I've been trying to work out a probability question but the solution has me a bit confused. This question is from 40 Puzzles and Problems in Probability and Mathematical Statistics by Wolfgang Schwarz:
Peter and Paula play a simple game of dice, as follows. Peter keeps throwing the (unbiased) die until he obtains the sequence 1 − 1 in two successive throws. For Paula, the rules are similar, but she throws the die until she obtains the sequence 1 − 2 in two successive throws. On average, will both have to throw the die the same number of times? If not, whose expected waiting time is shorter (no explicit calculations are required)?
The solution states:
Peter’s sequence will usually consist of a certain number of 1s, each of which is followed by a number different from 1 with p = 5/6. If, after obtaining a 1, he fails to achieve the desired 1 − 1 run, then the number thrown was necessarily different from 1 and, therefore, cannot constitute the potential beginning of a potential 1 − 1 run. This is different for Paula: if she fails to throw a 2 after an initial 1, then she may do so by throwing another 1, which in turn could be the start of a potential 1 − 2 run. Therefore, the expected waiting time will be somewhat shorter for Paula.
I don't really understand this solution, perhaps I'm misunderstanding the question/solution. From what I understand, the suggestion is that Paula could throw 1 followed by another 1, which would not be a win, but would then form the potential start of a 1-2 run. The bit that confuses me is that this sequence (1-1) forms the win for Peter, so surely Peter has an advantage in this scenario?