Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with weighted-sampling
Search options not deleted
user 11939
If you have survey data with weights, please use "survey-sampling" instead. If you need to draw Monte Carlo samples from a distribution that is intractable/inconvenient, and have to use a sampler from a simpler distribution that you would then correct with weights, please use "importance-sampling", "monte-carlo" and/or "simulation" instead.
1
vote
Practical difference between "sampling" and "re-sampling with replacement"
The practical difference between "sampling" and "sampling with replacement" is really in the accounting part of the probability weights, whether or not you can't have (or don't want) your whole data s …
- 206