Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with optimization
Search options not deleted
user 122888
Use this tag for any use of optimization within statistics.
0
votes
0
answers
907
views
Tuning skopt to minimise correctly
of running the model (~1 to 20s), and the number of instances to fit, and the fact that my error function must be evaluated numerically (so no analytic derivative function) I was looking at Bayesian optimization … I have already tried increasing the number of random samples to initiate the optimizer, and initiating with a 5 by 5 uniform grid of samples (I can't sample much finer without making the optimization process …
- 135