Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with lime
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 125449
Questions related to the Locally Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) method of explaining black-box machine learning models.
0
votes
0
answers
94
views
Scaled and Unscaled features are giving different feature importances when using LIME
While using LIME, I am getting signficantly different "top drivers" for scaled and non-scaled models.
Questions:
Why would I see different results for both?
Which version should I use? …
- 297
1
vote
0
answers
251
views
Curious on using black box model interpreters (LIME, SHAP, etc) for production models
My first thought and experiment was to use LIME since it seems to be the most popular for similar use cases but I see a big problem with this:
There is a kernel width parameter in most packages that … Questions:
For those of you who have used LIME in a similar context, how did you overcome this?
2 What other alternatives do I have? …
- 297