Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with multinomial-distribution
Search options not deleted
user 14465
A multivariate, discrete probability distribution used to describe the results of a random experiment where each of $n$ outcomes are placed into one of $k$ nominal categories.
4
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Fit a multinomial model using proportions instead of raw data
I want to fit a non ordered multinomial model to data. In it, the dependent variable has 3 categories (success, partial success, fail) and i have a binary predictor and two other continuous predictors …
- 580
3
votes
0
answers
94
views
scaling and centering in multinomial model changes significance of terms and interactions
I am unclear whether scaling and centering my predictor variables in a multinomial model. I want that model for first determining the relative strength of single terms and interactions on a given data …
- 580
1
vote
0
answers
84
views
transform multinomial variable to continous for testing
Following Glenn comments im editing my question and posting an example:
I want to know if my procedure here is valid.
We tested the relationship between ecomorph and escape behavior across ten spec …
- 580
0
votes
0
answers
422
views
difficulties evaluating if a ordinal multnomial model fitted with polr (in Rstudio) can be u...
I'm getting very different output when i perform a multinomial ordinal model depending on wether I scale or not my data first. Anyone could tell me why?
Here are the results with raw data:
polr(for …
- 580