Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with interaction
Search options not deleted
user 198412
A situation where the effect of an explanatory variable may depend on the value of another explanatory variable.
1
vote
0
answers
121
views
Inconsistent results between sjPlot and Anova()when including interaction terms in lmer() in R
My model includes interaction terms
m1.3.5=lmer(Q3~1+Q4+gender+gcOUT*gender+maxXcorr*gender+(1+Q4+gcOUT*gender+maxXcorr*gender|sub))
The "gender" variable is binary, and the others are continuous variables … Note that if without interaction variables, the results of these two are the same.
Thank you all for your great help in advance :) …
- 23