Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with weighted-sampling
Search options not deleted
user 27482
If you have survey data with weights, please use "survey-sampling" instead. If you need to draw Monte Carlo samples from a distribution that is intractable/inconvenient, and have to use a sampler from a simpler distribution that you would then correct with weights, please use "importance-sampling", "monte-carlo" and/or "simulation" instead.
4
votes
1
answer
541
views
Correct variance estimation for random sample post-stratification weights
I'm dealing with a random sample and I have a question about its poststratification weights. Let's assume that:
this is a random sample of addresses, but post-stratification weights have been cal …
- 155