Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with dag
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 3058
DAG stands for Directed Acyclic Graph. DAGs are commonly used to help people think about causal patterns amongst variables.
6
votes
2
answers
378
views
DAGs and all models are wrong motto, what's the implication?
Let's say I have a DAG and I find the right to way to estimate the causal effect of interest (which adjustment to make etc.). Then, I realize my model is wrong. …
- 1,820
4
votes
1
answer
377
views
Fixed effects in DAGs
I think that both fixed effects capture every effect person and item ideology could have, and thus my DAG should be like this:
In this case, the model is identified and everything is good. … So, my question is: Is my DAG correct? Or is it possible for person and items ideology to have a direct effect on belief, not mediated by the fixed effects? …
- 1,820
2
votes
1
answer
254
views
Third Newton's law as a DAG [closed]
How can I represent this with a DAG?
I'm asking because I was reading Michael Nielsen's account of causality, and he says that "We can’t have X causing Y causing Z causing X! … And I was wondering how we could fit this thinking with Newton's third law, since it seems that A causes B and B causes A at the same time, and thus we wouldn't be able to draw a DAG for this simple law …
- 1,820