Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pearson-r
Search options not deleted
user 49356
The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is a measure of the linear relationship between two variables $X$ and $Y$, giving a value between +1 and −1.
2
votes
1
answer
831
views
When testing Pearson's r, when should I use r-to-t transformation instead of [Fisher's] r-to...
At least two tests are common for testing the significance of a Pearson correlation coefficient.
Comparing $t=\frac{\sqrt{r^2/(1-r^2)}}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{N-2}}}$ to Student's $t$-distribution with $N-2 …
1
vote
Accepted
When testing Pearson's r, when should I use r-to-t transformation instead of [Fisher's] r-to...
That is correct.
(The answer to my question was posted by another user as a since-deleted comment. I'm adding this comment so I can mark the question as answered.)