Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with rule-of-thumb
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 603
Advises on statistical analysis that are often useful in practice (but are not always guaranteed to work).
10
votes
What references should be cited to support using 30 as a large enough sample size?
Mostly arbitrary rule of thumb. This statement depends on a number of factor to be true. For example on the distribution of the data. If the data comes from a Cauchy for example, even 30^30 observatio …
- 23k