Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with maximum-likelihood
Search options not deleted
user 68121
a method of estimating parameters of a statistical model by choosing the parameter value that optimizes the probability of observing the given sample.
0
votes
Derivation of MLE of linear regression: and now? Why is there discrepancy to lm in R?
Thanks a lot!
I understood the problem and your solution.
But I don't get how this could be computed using the $\textbf{X}$ 2xn matrix.
I don't know how to solve this for $\beta_0$ and $\beta_1$:
$ …
- 79
7
votes
3
answers
880
views
Derivation of MLE of linear regression: and now? Why is there discrepancy to lm in R?
I want to understand the ML Estimation of the linear model from top to bottom or vice versa ;-).
I totally get the part of formulating the LogLikelihood function and how to get the derivatives of beta …
- 79