Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with r
Search options not deleted
user 89399
Use this tag for any *on-topic* question that (a) involves `R` either as a critical part of the question or expected answer, & (b) is not *just* about how to use `R`.
2
votes
1
answer
868
views
Analyzing multiple dependent pairs of 2x2 contingency tables
Suppose I have experimental data from pre- and post-treatment, and this data is split according to two binary categories like so:
\begin{array} {r|c|c|l}
pre-treatment, q\#1 & \text{accurate} & \text{ … \begin{array} {r|c|c|l}
post-treatment, q\#1 & \text{accurate} & \text{inaccurate} &\\
\hline
\text{"I was right."} & 24 & 1 & 25\\
\hline
\text{"I was wrong."} & 0 & 2 & 2\\
\hline
&24&3
\end{array} …
- 123