Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with self-study
Search options not deleted
user 94652
A routine exercise designed to test one's knowledge; often from a textbook, course, or test used for a class or self-study. This community's policy is to "provide helpful hints" for such questions rather than complete answers.
1
vote
How to prove probability problem
I would approach it through a frequentist definition of probability, by showing that the set of events that count as D ∩ C has the same count as the set of events that count as D. That is P(D ∩ C) = …
- 411
1
vote
comparing one sample t-test, wilcoxon signed rank test, and sign test in a simulation
You can use the wilcoxon test and the sign test, you just create a second sample in which the null hypothesis value is zero (or whatever the H0 value for mu is) in each case. Then the differences are …
- 411