A well-known result is that the only density that is both spherical and independent error is normal: more precisely
Let $e_i$ be errors,
If the joint probability density satisfies $$f_n(e_1,e_2, ..., e_n) = f_1(e_1)f_1(e_2)...f_1(e_n)$$ (independence) and if it is spherical: $$f_n(e_1,e_2, ..., e_n) = g_n(\Sigma_{i=1}^{n} e_i^2)$$
then, the only densities that satisfy both conditions are the normal densities:
$$f_1(e_i)={1 \over \sqrt{2 \pi}\sigma} \, \exp(-{1\over2\sigma^2} e_i^2)$$
How could I prove it?
I guess taking the derivative of $e_i$ of $f(e_1,e_2, ..., e_n) = f(e_1)f(e_2)...f(e_n)= f(\Sigma_{i=1}^{n} e_i^2)$ would be a first move..
Similar result I just found..
"Theorem [Herschel-Maxwell]: Let Z∈Rn be a random vector for which (i) projections into orthogonal subspaces are independent and (ii) the distribution of Z depends only on the length ||Z||. Then Z is normally distributed.
Cited by George Cobb in Teaching statistics: Some important tensions (Chilean J. Statistics Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2011) at p. 54."
from What is the most surprising characterization of the Gaussian (normal) distribution?