I will use $(X,Y)$ for the observation. Given $w = w_1$, we have that the variances of $X$ and $Y$ are $a$ and $b$ respectively, while the covariance is $c$.
Thus, the correlation coefficient $\rho = \frac{c}{\sqrt{ab}}$ and so
$1-\rho^2 = 1 - \frac{c^2}{ab} = \frac{1}{ab}$. The two conditional (joint) densities are joint normal densities given by
$$\begin{align}
f_1(x,y) &= \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{ab(1-\rho^2)}}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2(1-\rho^2)}\left(\frac{x^2}{a} - 2\rho\frac{xy}{\sqrt{ab}} + \frac{y^2}{b}\right)\right]\\
&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[-\frac{ab}{2}\left(\frac{x^2}{a} - 2\frac{c}{\sqrt{ab}}\frac{xy}{\sqrt{ab}} + \frac{y^2}{b}\right)\right]\\
&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(bx^2 - 2cxy + ay^2\right)\right],\\
f_2(x,y)
&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left((x-d)^2+(y-e)^2\right)\right]\\
\end{align}$$
The decision boundary is the set of all $(x,y)$ for which $f_1(x,y) = f_2(x,y)$, and so the decision boundary is the conic section specified by
$$bx^2 -2cxy +ay^2 - \left((x-d)^2 + (y-e)^2\right) = 0.$$
Edit: As pointed out in the comment by whuber,
this conic section can be a hyperbola as well as an ellipse or
parabola (including as a special case a straight line).
The discriminant $c^2-(a-1)(b-1) = (a+b)-2$ (since we are
given that $ab-c^2=1$)
can be positive, negative, or zero depending on the variances
$a$ and $b$.
I suspect that this will be work out to be
either an ellipse or a parabola (but not
a hyperbola) depending on
the parameters $a,b,c,d,e$, including, as a special case of parabola,
a straight line. A specific example of a straight-line decision
boundary is when $c = 0$ and $a = b = 1$ so that the
only difference between the two conditional distributions is the means:
$X$ and $Y$ are conditionally independent unit-variance
normal random variables under either hypothesis. In this instance,
the decision boundary is the perpendicular bisector of the
straight line segment with end-points $(0,0)$ and $(d,e)$.
What puzzles me, though, is a hyperbola as a decision boundary
since a hyperbola partitions the plane into three regions
(two of which are congruent). The joint density surfaces are
a (possibly) flattened bell and a circular bell, and
so one of these bells subsumes the other in two non-contiguous regions
of the plane: I just can't visualize it. Perhaps someone will
create a nice illustration....