Timeline for $\chi^2$ test of homogeneity for three-way contingency table
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 8, 2011 at 21:27 | vote | accept | MYaseen208 | ||
May 8, 2011 at 21:26 | vote | accept | MYaseen208 | ||
May 8, 2011 at 21:27 | |||||
May 4, 2011 at 9:18 | history | edited | MYaseen208 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
May 1, 2011 at 1:47 | comment | added | probabilityislogic | Just my curiosity - any particular reason that the M-F split is so unbalanced? This seems odd to have a fixed total of 274 for F and only 46 for M. Or are these based on "population" proportions - there is a 274:46 split in the population of F to M? | |
May 1, 2011 at 0:34 | comment | added | Henry | When you say homogeneity, are you trying to test whether the treatments have the same response proportions of $R/(R+NR)$ with gender as a confounding variable, or that the treatments have the same proportions as each other and for both genders? | |
Apr 30, 2011 at 20:31 | history | edited | MYaseen208 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 42 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 18:26 | history | edited | user88 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 425 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 18:22 | comment | added | user88 | @AndyW No, only the math-mode subset is supported (The engine is called MathJax, see its page for detailed docs). Yet I think a proper way to post tables is plain text in code block, so it could be copyable. | |
Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29 | history | edited | MYaseen208 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 492 characters in body; added 140 characters in body
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 14:03 | history | edited | cardinal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed taglines.
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 12:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/64300795172106240 | ||
Apr 30, 2011 at 9:41 | answer | added | probabilityislogic | timeline score: 5 | |
Apr 30, 2011 at 9:24 | history | edited | user88 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Apr 30, 2011 at 8:07 | history | asked | MYaseen208 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |