Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 29, 2014 at 8:32 vote accept Steven B. Peutz
Sep 26, 2014 at 13:24 answer added Horst Grünbusch timeline score: 2
Sep 26, 2014 at 13:10 comment added Steven B. Peutz Kolmogorov Smirnov (as well as Shapiro Wilk) are based on NHST and so they tend to be overly strict in large samples (because more easily signicant if large N) due to their larger 'power'(as with NHST).
Sep 26, 2014 at 13:00 comment added Glen_b "Kolmogorov-Smirnov test < .000 BUT N=around 1200 so K-S not really reliable" ... what does this mean? In what sense is it "not reliable"?
Sep 26, 2014 at 11:27 history edited Steven B. Peutz CC BY-SA 3.0
added 310 characters in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:59 comment added Steven B. Peutz Thank you, I divided the z value by the square root of N (for the Mann-Whitney U effect size..)
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:56 history edited Steven B. Peutz CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:42 comment added Horst Grünbusch More important question: How did you calculate/understand the effect size for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test?
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:39 comment added Horst Grünbusch The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test looks if the data follow a certain normal distribution. How did you specify $\mu$ and $\sigma$ for that purpose? Generally, in order to test if the data come from some normal distribution, there is the Shapiro-Wilk-test. More generally, Goodness-of-fit tests are not appropriate to choose subsequent test statistics.
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:12 history edited Nick Cox CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Sep 26, 2014 at 10:08 history asked Steven B. Peutz CC BY-SA 3.0