Timeline for Addressing model uncertainty
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
|
|
S Jun 22, 2014 at 13:16 | history | suggested | Faheem Mitha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor typo fixes.
|
Jun 22, 2014 at 13:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 22, 2014 at 13:16 | |||||
Jun 23, 2012 at 7:09 | comment | added | probabilityislogic | it could also be due to the Laplace approximation performing poorly as well | |
Jun 23, 2012 at 7:07 | comment | added | probabilityislogic | Your note about Bayes factors performing well in high dimensions, but BIC performing poorly, is a likely consequence of ignoring the determinant term that the BIC approximation makes. BIC takes an approximation as $\log|A_n|\approx\log|nA_1|=p\log n+\log|A_1|$ where $A_n$ is observed informative and $A_1$ is expected information. When the dimension of the parameter space is large, $\log|A_1|=O(1)$ is a poor approximation, especially if there is very large variation in the parameter dimension across models. | |
Jul 13, 2011 at 14:47 | history | edited | suncoolsu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Jul 11, 2011 at 20:21 | vote | accept | Nick | ||
Jul 6, 2011 at 5:49 | history | edited | suncoolsu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2011 at 3:06 | history | answered | suncoolsu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |