Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
S Jan 4, 2015 at 2:15 history bounty ended Charlie Parker
S Jan 4, 2015 at 2:15 history notice removed Charlie Parker
Jan 2, 2015 at 22:53 history edited Charlie Parker CC BY-SA 3.0
added 711 characters in body
Dec 28, 2014 at 22:37 answer added M T timeline score: 3
S Dec 28, 2014 at 21:36 history suggested M T CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed some minor grammar but mainly wanted to make clear the distinction between Khan's frequentist example and the Bayesian approach. It seemed a couple well chosen additions to the question would be much simpler than having to quote it. I will add a more detailed comment.
Dec 28, 2014 at 21:19 review Suggested edits
S Dec 28, 2014 at 21:36
Dec 28, 2014 at 14:59 answer added Livid timeline score: 0
Dec 28, 2014 at 10:04 comment added Xi'an The first line of my Answer is "A statistical model is given by a family of probability distributions". The pair (distribution,statistical model) does not make sense. And yes indeed the Bayesian approach puts a prior on the pair (model index, model parameter), see line 9 of my Answer.
Dec 28, 2014 at 9:57 comment added Xi'an My answer uses the normal example, which is one of the simplests I can think of: $H_0:\,X\sim\mathcal{N}(0,1)$ versus $H_1:\,X\sim\mathcal{N}(\theta,1)$. If this setting does not make sense to you, I strongly suggest you read an introductory textbook (as for instance this free on-line version).
Dec 28, 2014 at 5:59 comment added Charlie Parker @rocinante is there a reference where I can see your coin hypothesis example explained in both paradigms? Is it to much to ask for you to explain it as an answer (if you can/want, I would appreciate it (and probably reward it), but I understand it can be annoying)? Thanks for your time and book suggestion, I am excited to read it! :)
Dec 28, 2014 at 4:17 comment added rocinante 2/2 Suppose you have a coin and you want to see if it is fair, so you flip it 50 times. You now have a data set about which you want to make some inference (i.e. is the coin biased or not). Logically, if the coin is fair, about half the tosses should be heads. (Note that this is not a stats derivation, but your own logical reasoning). That is your hypothesis. You can test this hypothesis 2 ways: the Bayesian way and the frequentist way.
Dec 28, 2014 at 4:14 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/549055819955048448
Dec 28, 2014 at 4:14 comment added rocinante It's not an easy thing to understand because it's not an easy thing to articulate in a concise way. Rather than think about this in abstract terms (like maps), maybe it will help if you think about it with a simpler example.1/2
Dec 28, 2014 at 4:01 comment added Charlie Parker @rocinante I think I agree with you. I am definitively confused about hypothesis testing in general (and the bayesian framework doesn't help at all). I will definitively take a look at that. Thanks for your patience and understanding, its greatly appreciated.
Dec 28, 2014 at 3:04 comment added rocinante I am hesitant to wade into this discussion because I think your problem is really that one of understanding what hypothesis testing means in principle, rather than specifically what hypothesis testing is in the Bayesian framework. To help with this, I suggest having a look at the book "Modes of Parametric Statistical Inference" by Geisser. books.google.ca/…
S Dec 28, 2014 at 2:31 history bounty started Charlie Parker
S Dec 28, 2014 at 2:31 history notice added Charlie Parker Improve details
Dec 23, 2014 at 18:33 comment added Charlie Parker @Xi'an I read the following wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_model is that what they mean by a model and a hypothesis? thnx for ur patience btw :)
Dec 23, 2014 at 18:30 answer added Xi'an timeline score: 10
Dec 23, 2014 at 5:08 history edited Charlie Parker CC BY-SA 3.0
added 145 characters in body
Dec 23, 2014 at 2:00 history asked Charlie Parker CC BY-SA 3.0