Skip to main content
33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:42 vote accept svannoy
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:40 vote accept svannoy
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:42
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:40 vote accept svannoy
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:40
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:40 vote accept svannoy
Apr 24, 2015 at 19:40
Apr 18, 2015 at 1:54 comment added svannoy I like the plot, I think I should have included something like it initially anyhow. I was looking at histograms to get a sense of trend/season, but this I think is better.
Apr 17, 2015 at 1:50 comment added rnso I always thought this plot was useful but @Tim did not like it. I have undeleted my answer.
Apr 17, 2015 at 1:38 comment added Glen_b svannoy -- I took the liberty of moving rnso's plot to your Q. @rnso -- I hope you don't mind. If you have some strong objection, let me know.
Apr 17, 2015 at 1:36 comment added Glen_b forecaster -- because in count data spread is related to mean. e.g. consider a Poisson count $y_t$, with mean $\mu_t$. In that case, $\text{Var}(y_t)=\mu_t$, so as the mean increases, the variance (and so also the spread) increases. [Indeed, often you find spread to be related to mean in some way for almost any data that has an upper or lower bound; there are clear reasons why this might be expected in those cases.]
Apr 17, 2015 at 1:32 history edited Glen_b CC BY-SA 3.0
added 294 characters in body
Apr 17, 2015 at 0:34 comment added forecaster @Glen_b, yes! the data requires transformations as it can be seen as the level shifts in 2009, there is more fluctuations/variability. Can you please let me know how and why this happens in count data vis-a-vis time series ?
Apr 16, 2015 at 20:34 history edited svannoy CC BY-SA 3.0
I've updated the question to provide new data that people can use for analyses. Specifically, I've added results of a modification in analytic technique and I've provided data to model season by the number of daylight minutes throughout the year
Apr 15, 2015 at 4:26 comment added Elvis Wow, thanks. I’ll try to rerun the Poisson regression with the daily data!
Apr 14, 2015 at 13:54 comment added Glen_b Since your data are counts, I'd expect variance to be related to the mean. The usual time series models don't account for that (however, you might try say a transformation, perhaps a Freeman-Tukey, say), or you could look at a time series model that's designed for count data. (If you don't do this it may not be a huge problem since the number only ranges over a factor of two or so.)
Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27 comment added svannoy @Elvis - I've posted a link to the daily count data. The data comes from death certificates which are 'public record' but require a process to obtain; however, the aggregated count data does not. PS - I tried the link myself and it worked, but I've not posted to a public dropbox folder in this way before so please let me know if the link does not work.
Apr 14, 2015 at 12:25 comment added svannoy Thanks @NickCox for cleaning up the grammar and putting in the links.
Apr 14, 2015 at 12:23 history edited svannoy CC BY-SA 3.0
I added a link to a csv file with the daily suicide counts
Apr 12, 2015 at 21:00 history edited Nick Cox CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Apr 12, 2015 at 19:15 answer added forecaster timeline score: 7
Apr 11, 2015 at 3:45 answer added rnso timeline score: 1
Apr 9, 2015 at 21:28 history edited svannoy CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Apr 9, 2015 at 7:22 comment added Elvis Is that from a public dataset? Could you make the week-by-week or even day-by-day data available?
Apr 8, 2015 at 8:26 answer added Elvis timeline score: 13
Apr 7, 2015 at 16:53 comment added Nick Cox The wording "one of our 50 states" implies that all readers belong to the United States. Manifestly many aliens lurk here too.
Apr 7, 2015 at 13:35 history edited Silverfish
add some tags
Apr 7, 2015 at 12:59 answer added javlacalle timeline score: 8
Apr 5, 2015 at 0:09 comment added svannoy @forecaster - the data come from death certificate data at the (a) state level. I've "dumped" the time series, the data itself I believe is too large to go into the post.
Apr 5, 2015 at 0:07 history edited svannoy CC BY-SA 3.0
I added several items requested (plot of daily counts) and one's I thought would be helpful (table of time series data, plot of residuals, details of the stationarity tests), and updated my understanding thus far.
Apr 4, 2015 at 12:36 comment added svannoy Thanks Richard, I was basing my conclusion more on the fact that nsdiffs() returned zero rather than actually interpreting the model. I need to go back and more fully understand the model that was selected by auto.arima()
Apr 4, 2015 at 9:53 comment added Richard Hardy In the SARIMA model there are the seasonal sar1 and sma1 terms, so your statement based on the model selected, there is a trend but not a seasonal component does not seem right. The sar1 and sma1 make up the seasonal component.
Apr 4, 2015 at 0:17 comment added rnso There seem to be a trend peaking at May-July but whether it is statistically significant is the question. It may be better if you plot by day of the year (1-366) rather than plotting monthly values. It may help if you post here 366 numbers indicating number of deaths on each day of the year for entire data.
Apr 4, 2015 at 0:08 comment added forecaster Very interesting problem Can you please post the data and also please share the source for this data set?
Apr 3, 2015 at 22:51 review First posts
Apr 3, 2015 at 23:07
Apr 3, 2015 at 22:47 history asked svannoy CC BY-SA 3.0