Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 12, 2018 at 9:56 answer added Rainald62 timeline score: 1
Nov 3, 2017 at 11:27 history edited kjetil b halvorsen
edited tags
Nov 1, 2017 at 19:18 history edited kjetil b halvorsen
edited tags
Jun 1, 2017 at 18:28 history edited kjetil b halvorsen
edited tags
Apr 25, 2016 at 11:17 answer added kjetil b halvorsen timeline score: 3
Mar 8, 2016 at 0:46 vote accept ali_m
Jul 24, 2015 at 11:21 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/624539862499246081
Jul 23, 2015 at 9:12 answer added Moose timeline score: 0
Jul 22, 2015 at 23:59 comment added Till Hoffmann Yes, Python code to generate data would be great!
Jul 22, 2015 at 22:53 comment added ttnphns What you called "parallel line plot" and I know as high-low plot seems a nice solution. Your particular plot looks messy because you plotted the markers, the line edges, too. Erase them. Next, colour your lines. Where 'dots' were greater apply one colour, where 'bars' were greater, apply the other colour. Additionally, you could project summary statistics (such as means) onto the axis.
Jul 22, 2015 at 22:41 comment added Vladislavs Dovgalecs Did you try to plot the distribution of the slope coefficients? Each line pair can be described by $k$ from $f(x)=kx+b$
Jul 22, 2015 at 22:16 answer added Sean Easter timeline score: 7
Jul 22, 2015 at 21:36 history edited ali_m CC BY-SA 3.0
added 149 characters in body
Jul 22, 2015 at 21:27 history edited ali_m CC BY-SA 3.0
added 875 characters in body
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:59 comment added ali_m @TillHoffmann That is real data. If it would help I can write some code to generate semi-realistic fake data (I write Python)?
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:57 comment added ali_m @whuber Sorry for being unclear. What I was hoping for was a way to represent the data such that the values for both groups are plotted along the same, rather than orthogonal axes (as they are in the 'sloping line' and 'parallel line' plots). The message is very simple - that the values for the 'bars' are generally higher than those for the 'dots'. Beyond that, I don't care greatly about representing the density of the distribution, although I would like to convey that there are a large number of pairs in the sample.
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:50 comment added whuber Could you explain what you mean by a "compact" representation? The scatterplot is clearly superior to all the others in terms of showing the relationships as well as individually unusual data in a small area; it only grows better as the dataset size increases. (10,000 is not large for a scatterplot.) You mention so many different graphics that it is impossible to deduce what you really need. Please tell us the purpose of your visualization: exactly what kind of information do you hope to learn or convey to others? How accurately and quickly do you intend it to be perceived and understood?
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:44 history edited ali_m CC BY-SA 3.0
added 246 characters in body
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:42 comment added Till Hoffmann sorry, I missed that. How are you generating your synthetic data at the moment?
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:42 answer added Dirk Horsten timeline score: 0
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:41 comment added ali_m @TillHoffmann Yes, I mentioned that at the end of my question. It's probably the best option I have at the moment, but I would prefer a more compact representation, and ideally one that represents the values of both groups along the same axis (perhaps I'm being unreasonably demanding...). I'll add the scatterplot to my question.
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:23 comment added Till Hoffmann Have you tried simply plotting the corresponding values of bar on the horizontal and dot on the vertical axis as a scatterplot?
Jul 22, 2015 at 20:17 history asked ali_m CC BY-SA 3.0