Timeline for What is an "uninformative prior"? Can we ever have one with truly no information?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 6, 2020 at 12:35 | history | edited | Xi'an | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 36 characters in body
|
Nov 9, 2015 at 18:53 | comment | added | Xi'an | From my brief correspondence with Maurice Dumas in the early 1990's, I remember that he wrote a Note aux Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, where he uses the $\log()$ and $\text{logit}()$ transforms to derive "invariant" priors. | |
Nov 9, 2015 at 18:39 | history | edited | whuber♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 445 characters in body
|
Nov 9, 2015 at 18:18 | history | edited | Neil G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Nov 7, 2015 at 8:36 | history | edited | Xi'an | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 90 characters in body
|
Nov 6, 2015 at 21:23 | comment | added | Xi'an | As far as I remember, Lhoste's invariance result is restricted to the transforms $\log\sigma$ and $\log p/(1-p)$ for parameters on $(0,\infty)$ and $(0,1)$, respectively. Other transforms from $(0,\infty)$ and $(0,1)$ to $\mathbb{R}$ will result in different priors. | |
Nov 6, 2015 at 21:21 | history | edited | Xi'an | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
Nov 6, 2015 at 20:56 | history | edited | Xi'an | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
Nov 6, 2015 at 19:29 | review | Low quality posts | |||
Nov 6, 2015 at 20:56 | |||||
Nov 6, 2015 at 18:45 | review | Late answers | |||
Nov 6, 2015 at 19:28 | |||||
Nov 6, 2015 at 18:30 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 6, 2015 at 19:38 | |||||
Nov 6, 2015 at 18:27 | history | answered | Heymann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |