Timeline for Differences between summary and anova function for multilevel (lmer) model
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2017 at 9:21 | history | edited | amoeba |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 23, 2017 at 20:24 | comment | added | Mark White | @Jake in short, yes. I'm not sure on the technical details of how the omnibus test does this, but it looks like the issue has been addressed here before: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/59910/… | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 19:37 | comment | added | Jake | @MarkWhite So, when I do an anova, is it doing some sort of correction for false positives for the multiple tests that are being done? | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 20:06 | comment | added | Mark White | @Jake not necessarily. Since you are doing 4 tests at once, there is an inflated risk of a Type I Error. | |
| Apr 21, 2017 at 20:03 | answer | added | Mark White | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 4, 2017 at 4:14 | comment | added | Jake | @mdewey yes that is my understanding of the difference between the two functions. Wouldn't it then follow that if I find at least 1 significant difference using the summary function, then I should find a significant effect in my anova table? Is that an incorrect assumption? | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 12:38 | comment | added | mdewey | Your understanding of the difference is not correct I fear as you are in one case testing one at a time and in the other testing all simultaneously. | |
| Apr 3, 2017 at 3:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 12:53 | |||||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 3:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 3:39 | |||||
| Apr 3, 2017 at 3:32 | history | asked | Jake | CC BY-SA 3.0 |