Skip to main content

Timeline for Minimum of Poissons

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 5, 2018 at 15:26 vote accept Conner DiPaolo
Feb 5, 2018 at 15:26
Jan 21, 2018 at 16:31 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/955115708169498624
Jan 21, 2018 at 11:41 comment added Conner DiPaolo @Xi'an nice catch that's definitely cleaner
Jan 21, 2018 at 10:01 comment added Xi'an You do not even need Jensen: $\min X_i\le X_i$ for all $i$'s, hence $\mathbb{E}[\min_i X_i] \leq\mathbb{E}[X_i]$ for all $i$'s.
Jan 21, 2018 at 9:56 history edited Conner DiPaolo CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Jan 21, 2018 at 9:55 answer added Conner DiPaolo timeline score: 0
Jan 21, 2018 at 9:32 history edited Conner DiPaolo CC BY-SA 3.0
typo fix and add iid example.
Jan 21, 2018 at 6:41 comment added Conner DiPaolo @Taylor I’m quite sure: the minimum of a collection of linear functionals over $\mathbb{R}^n$ is concave (draw a picture to check). Denote $X=(X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n$. Then $\min X_i = \min \langle X,e_i\rangle$ is a minimum of linear functionals and hence concave, so Jensen applies.
Jan 21, 2018 at 5:55 comment added Taylor are you sure you can use Jensen's inequality here?
Jan 21, 2018 at 3:46 history edited Conner DiPaolo CC BY-SA 3.0
clarity
Jan 20, 2018 at 18:02 comment added Conner DiPaolo @whuber ah thanks. I meant that $X_i$ are effectively i.i.d because for large enough $\gamma$, the probability that $Y = X_n$ is low.
Jan 20, 2018 at 18:01 history edited Conner DiPaolo CC BY-SA 3.0
typo
Jan 20, 2018 at 17:41 comment added whuber What do you mean by "assume $X_i$" in the last sentence? Are some words missing?
Jan 20, 2018 at 17:04 review First posts
Jan 20, 2018 at 17:54
Jan 20, 2018 at 17:01 history asked Conner DiPaolo CC BY-SA 3.0