Timeline for Is the procedure to argue about different ml techniques in a specific dataset valid?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 9:22 | answer | added | cherub | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 21:23 | comment | added | So S | Thanks for your feedback. I've tried to clarify my questions. | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 21:23 | history | edited | So S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarification of the questions
|
| Feb 20, 2018 at 15:47 | comment | added | Aksakal | you didn't describe your data, actually. how many variables you have? how many observations? I'm afraid you don't have enough of them to do sensible ML, and instead usual reliability stats tools could be more appropriate | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 15:25 | answer | added | alexeymosco | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 13:46 | comment | added | cherub | It is not clear what you are asking, or more specifically which point you are confused about. Maybe you could extract two or three specific questions. Right now the only real question I can see is, if you can argue with the box plots. But even there I don't really understand the question. Do you mean in the sense you are trying to support a certain decision? First I'd say that the representation is not helping the message; e.g. what is the independent axis? | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 13:20 | history | asked | So S | CC BY-SA 3.0 |