Skip to main content

I am nvestigatinginvestigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,:

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1)  ,2 2 (Dose 1)  ,3 3 (Dose 2),4 4 (Dose 3),5 5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1)  ,2 2 (Dose 1)  ,3 3 (Dose 2),4 4 (Dose 3),5 5 (No dose)

etc.

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased. To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation.

I am nvestigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1)  ,2 (Dose 1)  ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1)  ,2 (Dose 1)  ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

etc.

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased. To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation.

I am investigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example:

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1), 2 (Dose 1), 3 (Dose 2), 4 (Dose 3), 5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1), 2 (Dose 1), 3 (Dose 2), 4 (Dose 3), 5 (No dose)

etc.

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased. To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation.

deleted 40 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Nick Cox
  • 59.5k
  • 8
  • 136
  • 212

Friedman's test or KrusalKruskal-Wallis?

I am currently doing a project investigatingnvestigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

etc.

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased.To To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation. Thank you!

Friedman's test or Krusal-Wallis?

I am currently doing a project investigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

etc

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased.To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation. Thank you!

Friedman's test or Kruskal-Wallis?

I am nvestigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

etc.

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased. To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation.

Source Link

Friedman's test or Krusal-Wallis?

I am currently doing a project investigating the effect of an intervention treatment on a group of samples over 5 time points (a period of 2 months in total)

For example,

Subject 1 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

Subject 2 - Timepoint 1 (Dose 1) ,2 (Dose 1) ,3 (Dose 2),4 (Dose 3),5 (No dose)

etc

The dependent variable measured is a protein concentration, so it is a continuous variable. At timepoints 3 and 4, the dosage of the intervention was increased.To compare the protein concentration of the samples between all 5 timepoints, which test would be more suitable?

I am personally leaning towards Friedman's test over Kruskal-Wallis, but would like some confirmation. Thank you!