Skip to main content
Cross Validated

Return to Question

Bumped by Community user
tidied up formatting
Source Link
Jeremy Miles
Jeremy Miles
  • 19k
  • 6
  • 46
  • 82

I am currently doing a confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS. I have 229 cases, no missing data, with a standardized questionnaire of 20 items, 4 factors. However, some indices specify that it does not fit well: C M I N=chi-square= 343.322, d f=64; G F I=df=64; GFI=.874; C F I=CFI=.817; R M S E A=RMSEA= 0.69.

What should I do? Maybe add the number of my respondents? try out another model?

I am currently doing a confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS. I have 229 cases, no missing data, with a standardized questionnaire of 20 items, 4 factors. However, some indices specify that it does not fit well: C M I N= 343.322, d f=64; G F I=.874; C F I=.817; R M S E A= 0.69.

What should I do? Maybe add the number of my respondents? try out another model?

I am currently doing a confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS. I have 229 cases, no missing data, with a standardized questionnaire of 20 items, 4 factors. However, some indices specify that it does not fit well: chi-square= 343.322, df=64; GFI=.874; CFI=.817; RMSEA= 0.69.

What should I do? Maybe add the number of my respondents? try out another model?

edited title
Link
Glen_b
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

BEGINNER here Poor model fit for confirmatory factor analysis

Source Link
Aufe Fallado
Aufe Fallado
  • 1
  • 1

BEGINNER here Poor model fit for confirmatory factor analysis

I am currently doing a confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS. I have 229 cases, no missing data, with a standardized questionnaire of 20 items, 4 factors. However, some indices specify that it does not fit well: C M I N= 343.322, d f=64; G F I=.874; C F I=.817; R M S E A= 0.69.

What should I do? Maybe add the number of my respondents? try out another model?