Timeline for How do I define an "interaction" contrast with single explantory variable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2019 at 21:17 | vote | accept | flies | ||
| S Oct 11, 2019 at 20:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 11, 2019 at 20:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 9, 2019 at 18:54 | vote | accept | flies | ||
| Oct 9, 2019 at 20:36 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2019 at 15:30 | answer | added | flies | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 7, 2019 at 13:11 | comment | added | flies | That's not an approach I happen to be familiar with and the four level categorical variable feels natural to me, as a matter of taste. Would dummy coding help clarify my question or help answer it? | |
| Oct 6, 2019 at 23:46 | comment | added | Jay Schyler Raadt |
So Sex.Drug in model 2 is a four level categorical variable? Don't you think dummy coding would work better?
|
|
| Oct 3, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/1179863846548361216 | ||
| S Oct 3, 2019 at 18:07 | history | bounty started | flies | ||
| S Oct 3, 2019 at 18:07 | history | notice added | flies | Draw attention | |
| Sep 23, 2019 at 17:14 | history | asked | flies | CC BY-SA 4.0 |