Timeline for Regression on a triangular shaped region of points representing a symmetric relation
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 at 19:50 | vote | accept | Henry B. | ||
| Jan 3, 2011 at 19:53 | answer | added | whuber♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 14, 2010 at 20:51 | comment | added | Henry B. | @onestop: Thanks. Good point. I was sloppy in my description there. | |
| Nov 14, 2010 at 20:50 | history | edited | Henry B. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 315 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2010 at 19:51 | comment | added | onestop | Post-edit: Your statements together seems to imply that the number of times i attacks j is always either 0 or 1. And that if i attacks j then j attacks i. So relating the number of attackes that i makes on j to the number j makes on i seems trivial. Sorry, I'm obviously not understanding something here. | |
| Nov 14, 2010 at 18:27 | history | edited | Henry B. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 14, 2010 at 17:49 | history | edited | Henry B. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 546 characters in body; added 125 characters in body
|
| Nov 14, 2010 at 7:39 | comment | added | onestop | Why did you want to do a regression of one coordinate on the other? The better way to do this depends on what is is you're trying to do. What's the aim? What question are you trying to answer? | |
| Nov 14, 2010 at 5:54 | comment | added | suncoolsu | If I understand you correctly. In your case, for the tuple (a,b), a and b are both observation (may be missing)? | |
| Nov 14, 2010 at 5:28 | history | asked | Henry B. | CC BY-SA 2.5 |