Skip to main content
added 53 characters in body
Source Link
BruceET
  • 57.6k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 94

In general, when you have ordinal categories, say for opinions, it is appropriate to use the median to describe the center of the sample, and thus estimate. Thus the median can estimate the center of the population of opinions. However, the definitions given in the questionnaire for your opinion categories are numerical (percentages). So you might use the mean, if you are careful about its interpretation.

As a practical matter, I wonder how accurately students cantry to guess the true percentage of classes with discussion when they just have to choose one of four intervals on a questionnaire. It seems best to take this approximate mean as saying "Roughly, 56% of classes (slightly more than half) had discussion," rather than as saying, "Exactly 56.195% of classes had discussion."

In general, when you have ordinal categories, it is appropriate to use the median to describe the center of the sample, and thus estimate the center of the population of opinions. However, the definitions given in the questionnaire for your categories are numerical. So you might use the mean, if you are careful about its interpretation.

As a practical matter, I wonder how accurately students can guess the true percentage of classes with discussion when they just have to choose one of four intervals on a questionnaire. It seems best to take this approximate mean as saying "Roughly, 56% of classes (slightly more than half) had discussion," rather than as saying, "Exactly 56.195% of classes had discussion."

In general, when you have ordinal categories, say for opinions, it is appropriate to use the median to describe the center of the sample. Thus the median can estimate the center of the population of opinions. However, the definitions given in the questionnaire for your opinion categories are numerical (percentages). So you might use the mean, if you are careful about its interpretation.

As a practical matter, I wonder how accurately students try to guess the true percentage of classes with discussion when they just have to choose one of four intervals on a questionnaire. It seems best to take this approximate mean as saying "Roughly, 56% of classes (slightly more than half) had discussion," rather than as saying, "Exactly 56.195% of classes had discussion."

added 23 characters in body
Source Link
BruceET
  • 57.6k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 94
set.seed(531)  # for reproducibility
x = sample(1:4, 100, rep=T, p=c(.2,.3,.3,.2))
tabulate(x)
[1] 11 29 36 24
mean(x)
[1] 2.73   # nonsense mean of ordinal labels
median(x)
[1] 3      # median of ordinal labels
set.seed(531)
x = sample(1:4, 100, rep=T, p=c(.2,.3,.3,.2))
tabulate(x)
[1] 11 29 36 24
mean(x)
[1] 2.73   # nonsense mean of ordinal labels
median(x)
[1] 3      # median of ordinal labels
set.seed(531)  # for reproducibility
x = sample(1:4, 100, rep=T, p=c(.2,.3,.3,.2))
tabulate(x)
[1] 11 29 36 24
mean(x)
[1] 2.73   # nonsense mean of ordinal labels
median(x)
[1] 3      # median of ordinal labels
added 40 characters in body
Source Link
BruceET
  • 57.6k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 94

Ordinal categorical variable. For example, suppose you have data from 100 werestudents (simulated in R) as follows, using numbers "1", "2", "3", "4" to label the four categories. We have frequencies $f_1 = 11, f_2= 29, f_3= 36, f_4= 24.$

In terms of percentages, many of my (simulated) students seem to be saying that the percentage of classes with discussion was somewhere in the interval $[51, 75].$$[51, 75],$ with some saying less discussion and some saying more.

Ordinal categorical variable. For example, suppose you have data from 100 were (simulated in R) as follows, using numbers "1", "2", "3", "4" to label the four categories. We have frequencies $f_1 = 11, f_2= 29, f_3= 36, f_4= 24.$

In terms of percentages, my (simulated) students seem to be saying that the percentage of classes with discussion was somewhere in the interval $[51, 75].$

Ordinal categorical variable. For example, suppose you have data from 100 students (simulated in R) as follows, using numbers "1", "2", "3", "4" to label the four categories. We have frequencies $f_1 = 11, f_2= 29, f_3= 36, f_4= 24.$

In terms of percentages, many of my (simulated) students seem to be saying that the percentage of classes with discussion was somewhere in the interval $[51, 75],$ with some saying less discussion and some saying more.

added 40 characters in body
Source Link
BruceET
  • 57.6k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 94
Loading
Source Link
BruceET
  • 57.6k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 94
Loading