Timeline for Interval Estimation for a Change in a Binomial Proportion
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2021 at 18:25 | answer | added | R. Cox | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 15, 2021 at 21:35 | answer | added | R. Cox | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 15, 2021 at 12:24 | vote | accept | R. Cox | ||
| Feb 11, 2021 at 17:57 | answer | added | R. Cox | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 6, 2021 at 10:20 | vote | accept | R. Cox | ||
| Feb 6, 2021 at 10:25 | |||||
| S Feb 5, 2021 at 20:06 | history | suggested | MarianD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatting
|
| Feb 5, 2021 at 20:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 5, 2021 at 20:06 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2021 at 13:24 | answer | added | R. Cox | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 3, 2021 at 13:40 | history | edited | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified what I would like, changed tag from 'binomial' to 'multinominal'
|
| Feb 2, 2021 at 21:17 | history | reopened | whuber♦ | ||
| Feb 2, 2021 at 18:57 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Feb 2, 2021 at 21:17 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2021 at 18:40 | history | edited | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a conclusion
|
| Feb 2, 2021 at 13:34 | comment | added | R. Cox | Why has this been locked please? | |
| Feb 2, 2021 at 12:50 | history | closed |
BruceET mdewey kjetil b halvorsen♦ |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Feb 2, 2021 at 12:49 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 1, 2021 at 16:32 | history | edited | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added intro
|
| Feb 1, 2021 at 10:30 | comment | added | R. Cox | This is different to the case where the two proportions can be assumed to be independent, here: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/58667/… | |
| Jan 31, 2021 at 19:22 | answer | added | BruceET | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 31, 2021 at 10:56 | history | edited | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added the requested details
|
| Jan 31, 2021 at 10:53 | comment | added | R. Cox | Very good question @BruceET, I have added those details. Thanks for your help! | |
| Jan 31, 2021 at 10:51 | history | edited | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added the requested details
|
| Jan 30, 2021 at 21:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 2, 2021 at 12:50 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2021 at 20:58 | comment | added | BruceET | If you really used the same patients both times, then summary results you give are not helpful. // You'd need both results for each patient. // For 6 patients 3 & 5 correct could mean 000111 vs 011111 (2 improvements, so maybe B better) or 000111 vs 111110 (3 improvements and one worse, only 2 agree, contradictory in a way such that maybe both A & B useless). A good start would be to provide relevant data. | |
| Jan 28, 2021 at 15:50 | history | asked | R. Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |