Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by Aleksejs Fomins
Bounty Ended with COOLSerdash's answer chosen by Aleksejs Fomins
Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1436434323696144385
deleted 9 characters in body
Source Link

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} \neq \mu_{B, Group1}$$H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} = \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} \neq \mu_{B, Group2}$$H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} = \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group1} \neq \mu_{Group2}$$H_0 : \mu_{Group1} = \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} \neq \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} \neq \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group1} \neq \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} = \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} = \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group1} = \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

Notice added Draw attention by Aleksejs Fomins
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Aleksejs Fomins
edited body
Source Link

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} \neq \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} \neq \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group2} \neq \mu_{Group2}$$H_0 : \mu_{Group1} \neq \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} \neq \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} \neq \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group2} \neq \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

Let's say there are two groups of participants. Each group is randomly split into control subgroup A and task subgroup B. For each of the 4 cases some random variable $x$ is measured, whose mean is denoted by $\mu$. I would like to perform 3 tests:

  1. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group1} \neq \mu_{B, Group1}$
  2. $H_0 : \mu_{A, Group2} \neq \mu_{B, Group2}$
  3. $H_0 : \mu_{Group1} \neq \mu_{Group2}$ regardless of subgroups

I sketch the tests below

Image of nested test

Question: What is the correct way to perform these tests? If I perform 3 independent t-tests, is it fair to apply Bonferroni correction to their p-values, or must I do a more sophisticated multiple comparisons correction. If making independent tests is not a robust procedure, what is? I want to do all 3 tests, so as far as I understand I don't want two-way ANOVA.

edited tags
Link
kjetil b halvorsen
  • 82.8k
  • 32
  • 201
  • 663
Source Link
Loading