Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 17, 2021 at 8:22 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 687 characters in body
Nov 17, 2021 at 7:49 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
Nov 17, 2021 at 6:40 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 353 characters in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 19:39 comment added whuber The part I did not catch--and now I see you asked for clarification--is whether the model is heteroscedastic or not. If, at the outset, you were to stipulate that you are discussing the heteroscedastic model, there would be less chance of misunderstanding. (+1)
Nov 16, 2021 at 18:30 comment added Christoph Hanck Yeah, $tr(H)=tr(X(X'X)^{-1}X')tr((X'X)^{-1}X'X)=k$ only depends on $k$, which gives rise to the unbiasedness of the standard estimator $\sum_i\hat e_i^2/(n-k)$ under homoskedasticity, eg stats.stackexchange.com/questions/76738/…. I am not sure how that applies here, though, since the heteroskedasticity robust estimator operates on the product $x_i\hat e_i$, so that we need to work on individual squared residuals, not their sum. See also econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/189084/1/qed_wp_0537.pdf
Nov 16, 2021 at 17:31 comment added whuber I believe that when you sum the squared residuals, though, you obtain a quantity closely related to the trace of $H,$ which depends only on $n$ and $p,$ regardless of the design, thereby leading to the claim in the question.
Nov 16, 2021 at 17:25 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 172 characters in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 13:48 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 341 characters in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 10:38 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 96 characters in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 10:30 history edited Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0
added 39 characters in body
Nov 16, 2021 at 10:21 history answered Christoph Hanck CC BY-SA 4.0