Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with pep's answer chosen by CommunityBot
added 34 characters in body
Source Link

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look at the first paragraph on page 10 under the "Discussion" section of Study 21 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look under the "Discussion" section of Study 2 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look at the first paragraph on page 10 under the "Discussion" section of Study 1 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

added 305 characters in body
Source Link

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look under the "Discussion" section of Study 2 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look under the "Discussion" section of Study 2 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!

Notice added Draw attention by keji11
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by keji11
Source Link

Explaining unique variance in multiple regression models

I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.

I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D. Each predictor, predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F may be shaped by individual differences C and D, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."

Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A, B, C and D as predictors and E and F as outcomes? And if A and B explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F above and beyond individual differences C and D?

Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!