I have a question about what explaining unique variance means in regression models and outputs.
I often read in research papers that "We found that outcomes E and F
could not simply be explained by individual differences C and D
. Each predictor, predictors A and B
was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F
above and beyond individual differences C and D
. ... Taken together, outcomes E and F
may be shaped by individual differences C and D
, but cannot be explained fully by those constructs."
Does this mean a multiple regression model was computed with A
, B
, C
and D
as predictors and E
and F
as outcomes? And if A
and B
explain unique variance, does that mean the correlation coefficients for those two predictors are significant? Essentially, what does it mean that predictors A and B
was uniquely related to one measure of outcomes E and F
above and beyond individual differences C and D
?
Here's the DOI to the paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000927 and the public link. You can look at the first paragraph on page 10 under the "Discussion" section of Study 1 and the "Perceived benefits of IER Interactions" for analysis strategy under Study 1.
Sorry if the question is too abstract. I don't have access to the data nor the regression models. Happy to elaborate more, and I appreciate any input on this!