Timeline for Testing of quadratic regression in R
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2022 at 15:57 | comment | added | dipetkov | I don't think this is a particularly instructive simulated data. Add a bit of noise and you'll get quite different results. | |
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 2:22 | vote | accept | B.Shermeister | ||
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 2:22 | vote | accept | B.Shermeister | ||
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 2:22 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2022 at 2:22 | vote | accept | B.Shermeister | ||
| S Dec 9, 2022 at 2:22 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2022 at 10:13 | answer | added | cdalitz | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 8, 2022 at 4:08 | answer | added | Dave2e | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 8, 2022 at 3:23 | history | edited | User1865345 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 8, 2022 at 3:02 | comment | added | B.Shermeister | That's a very good point, thank you, but please see my edit to the question regarding a regression with only a quadratic variable. | |
| Dec 8, 2022 at 3:01 | history | edited | B.Shermeister | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 783 characters in body
|
| Dec 8, 2022 at 2:05 | comment | added | Dave2e | The result may say the quadratic factor is statistically significant, but with a value is $10^{-14}$ it is physically insignificant. Probably a result of a floating point rounding error | |
| Dec 8, 2022 at 1:01 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body; edited title
|
| S Dec 8, 2022 at 0:41 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 8, 2022 at 2:03 | |||||
| S Dec 8, 2022 at 0:41 | history | asked | B.Shermeister | CC BY-SA 4.0 |