Added in response to the OP's comment below:
If you have two separate regressions, you have all the ingredients from the formula that Glen_b, other than the covariance term. You can assume it's zero if that makes sense with your model, or you can estimate the two equations as a system. It's hard to know for sure without the details. One way to do the latter is with Seemingly Unrelated Regression:
. webuse regress
. sureg (eq1:y x1 x2) (eq2:y x1 x3)
Seemingly unrelated regression
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Equation Obs Parms RMSE "R-sq" chi2 P
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eq1 148 2 4.54006 0.3758 91.48 0.0000
eq2 148 2 3.770546 0.5694 211.94 0.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
eq1 |
x1 | 7.472932 .98949 7.55 0.000 5.533568 9.412297
x2 | -.4768772 .7799875 -0.61 0.541 -2.005625 1.05187
_cons | -1.374358 2.883296 -0.48 0.634 -7.025514 4.276798
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
eq2 |
x1 | 4.338581 .7852935 5.52 0.000 2.799434 5.877728
x3 | -.0026865 .0003774 -7.12 0.000 -.0034261 -.0019468
_cons | 16.32873 3.214735 5.08 0.000 10.02797 22.6295
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. nlcom ratio:[eq1]_b[x1]/[eq2]_b[x1]
ratio: [eq1]_b[x1]/[eq2]_b[x1]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
ratio | 1.722437 .2773696 6.21 0.000 1.178803 2.266071
------------------------------------------------------------------------------