Skip to main content
rephrased and copied the question from the title to the body to improve post readability
Source Link

Does it have to do with the interdependence of one equation on the lagged values of its own as well as the other equations?

If I remember correctly, in simultaneous equations, cross-causality is also a cause for endogeneity, but in VAR models, the causality moves in one direction, the past impacts the future and not vice-versa.

So why are the variables in a VAR model considered endogenous? Does it have to do with the interdependence of one equation on the lagged values of its own as well as the other equations?

Does it have to do with the interdependence of one equation on the lagged values of its own as well as the other equations?

If I remember correctly, in simultaneous equations, cross-causality is also a cause for endogeneity, but in VAR models the causality moves in one direction, the past impacts the future and not vice-versa.

If I remember correctly, in simultaneous equations, cross-causality is also a cause for endogeneity, but in VAR models, the causality moves in one direction, the past impacts the future and not vice-versa.

So why are the variables in a VAR model considered endogenous? Does it have to do with the interdependence of one equation on the lagged values of its own as well as the other equations?

Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
edited tags
Link
Richard Hardy
  • 69.5k
  • 13
  • 126
  • 278
Source Link

Why are the variables in a VAR model considered endogenous?

Does it have to do with the interdependence of one equation on the lagged values of its own as well as the other equations?

If I remember correctly, in simultaneous equations, cross-causality is also a cause for endogeneity, but in VAR models the causality moves in one direction, the past impacts the future and not vice-versa.