Skip to main content
deleted 24 characters in body
Source Link
Ferdi
  • 5.3k
  • 10
  • 47
  • 64

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal.

replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosionCorrelation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered.

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

added 22 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
user88
user88

Ordinal Shall I treat vegetation group as an ordinal or nominal Variablevariable?

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered. 

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are: vegetation loss, no change non vegetated areas, no change in vegetated areas and vegetation gain.

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

Ordinal or nominal Variable

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered. Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are: vegetation loss, no change non vegetated areas, no change in vegetated areas and vegetation gain. While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

Shall I treat vegetation group as an ordinal or nominal variable?

As a follow on from here: Correlation between vegetation and erosion, I am having some trouble with the type of data that I have. I am confused as to whether my four categories are ordered. 

Specifically, my four groups within my categorical variable are:

  • vegetation loss,
  • no change non vegetated areas,
  • no change in vegetated areas and
  • vegetation gain.

While they are in order of an increasing amount of vegetation, I'm not sure if they would be considered nominal or ordinal. Any advice appreciated.

title capitalization
Link
Gala
  • 8.6k
  • 2
  • 32
  • 44
Loading
Source Link
Loading