I'm writing a research paper in entomology that compares 6 categorical variables (species) in terms of one dependent anatomic continuous variable. My samples look very normal by box-plots, etc. Looking at the "largest standard deviation can't be more than twice the smallest standard deviation rule of thumb, one of the six samples has a standard deviation that is less than half the largest $0.01847$ vs. $0.05181$). The other st. deviations are all "OK". Sample sizes range from 13 for several species to 32 for another.
Doing a one-way ANOVA on the six samples and ignoring the one species too small st. dev. I get $F > 40$ and a $p$ value of $9.6 \times 10^{-24}$, so I am sure the result is significant.
Can I just do the ANOVA anyway. What comment should I make about the one "smallish" variance? Is it a problem to have very unequal sample sizes? (Mine are 25, 22, 13, 13, 13, 32.)