$\newcommand{\v}{\operatorname{var}}\newcommand{\c}{\operatorname{cov}}\newcommand{\e}{\operatorname{E}}$
Lemma: Suppose $U,V$ are normally distributed, but also jointly normally distributed, i.e. so distributed that no matter which (non-random) scalars $a$ and $b$ are, the random variable $aU+bV$ is normally distributed. Suppose $\e(U) = \alpha,$ $\e(V) = \beta,$ $\v(U) = \sigma^2,$ $\v(V) = \tau^2,$ and $\c(U,V) = \rho\sigma\tau$ (so $\rho$ is the correlation). Then the conditional distribution of $V$ given $U$ is
$$
V \mid U \sim N\left( \beta + \rho\tau\cdot\frac{U-\alpha} \sigma, \quad \tau^2(1-\rho^2) \right).
$$
Now suppose $V=X_1$ and $U= \overline X.$ Observe that these satisfy the hypotheses of the Lemma. And
\begin{align}
\alpha & = \mu, \\
\beta & = \mu, \\
\sigma^2 & = 1/n, \\
\tau^2 & = 1, \\
\rho & = 1/\sqrt n.
\end{align}
Therefore by the Lemma,
$$
X_1\mid \overline X \sim N\left( \overline X ,\quad \frac {n-1} n \right). \tag 1
$$
Therefore
$$
\Pr\left( X_1<u \mid \overline X \right) = \Phi\left( \frac{u - \overline X}{\sqrt{\frac{n-1} n}} \right).
$$
(The lack of dependence of line $(1)$ above upon $\mu$ is what it means to say that $\overline X$ is sufficient for this family of distributions.)