2
$\begingroup$

I hope to build a fully empirical model of Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE), i.e. the number of calories an individual must eat in order to neither lose nor gain weight.

As data, I have individuals' weight (measured daily) and calorie intake (also daily).

As the TDEE is not directly observed, it occurred to me to use a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for this. However, there are continuously many states that the system can be in -- one's TDEE could be any nonnegative real number. Does that mean an HMM is the wrong tool? If so, what might serve better here?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

HMMs can be used with a continuous state space, in the sense that you can extend the concepts (Bayesian reasoning, hidden/observed random variables, ...) and the use that same framework with continuous hidden variables. Quoting Wikipedia:

Hidden Markov models can also be generalized to allow continuous state spaces. Examples of such models are those where the Markov process over hidden variables is a linear dynamical system, with a linear relationship among related variables and where all hidden and observed variables follow a Gaussian distribution. In simple cases, such as the linear dynamical system just mentioned, exact inference is tractable (in this case, using the Kalman filter); however, in general, exact inference in HMMs with continuous latent variables is infeasible, and approximate methods must be used, such as the extended Kalman filter or the particle filter.

This tutorial is a good introduction on the topic.

As for your precise application, I am not familiar with it and there is too few details for me to judge. But you might give HMMs a try!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.