1
$\begingroup$

I want to implement an AFT model to study the failure time of a product given it's width.

$$S(t|width)=S_0((\beta_0+\beta_1 \times width)t)$$

However the prodction has varied during the time (less production at the beginning of the commercialisation of the product). Is it problematic ? And is there anyway to fix this problem by adding a variable in the model ?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you say production varied, are you referring to the total number of products created? Did anything change about the relationship between failure time and width? $\endgroup$
    – Eli
    Commented May 6, 2021 at 13:36
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is the total number of products created. But the relationship between failure time and width keep unchanged $\endgroup$
    – Bérénice
    Commented May 7, 2021 at 5:57

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Only someone with knowledge of the subject matter can say for sure whether it might be problematic that "production has varied during the time." I assume that survival is estimated for each individual item from its production or first-service date.

If you think that reliability has systematically varied as a function of calendar time or production rate at the time of each item's production, you could include either or both as covariates in your model. Again, the choice would be based on your understanding of the underlying processes.

Continuous predictors like those can be modeled flexibly with splines so that you don't have to hypothesize a particular form of the relationship(s) between calendar time (or production rate) and reliability; the data can speak for themselves to determine the form(s). Standard tests on the coefficients determine whether the hypothesized extra effects of calendar time or production rate on reliability are statistically "significant"; the magnitudes of those coefficients would illustrate their practical significance.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much it is pretty clear. $\endgroup$
    – Bérénice
    Commented May 6, 2021 at 13:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.