1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to show some results in binary response models, and a couple of the proofs use the "fact" that $E(u^2)=Var(y)$, but I can't see why this is.

The setup is that $y$ takes on the value $0$ or $1$, and we could write \begin{equation} P(y=1|\mathbf{x})=g(\mathbf{x\beta}) \end{equation} where $g:\mathbb{R} \to (0,1)$ ($g$ could represent the Normal CDF in the case of a Probit for example). Or, you could take the Poisson case where \begin{equation} P(y=1|\mathbf{x})=\exp\left[-E\left(y\middle\vert\mathbf{x}\right)\right]\frac{E\left(y\middle\vert\mathbf{x}\right)^y}{y!} \end{equation}

In showing some results use, specifically, $E(u^2|\mathbf{x})=Var(y|\mathbf{x})$ (where note that we define $u=y-g(\mathbf{x\beta}$). I'm trying to figure out why this would be true, but can't see why. Anyone know why this is?

Thanks!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Under the model, $E(y|x)=g(\mathbf{x} \beta)$. Therefore $E(u|x)=0$, making $Var(u|x) = E(u^2|x) - E(u|x)^2 = E(u^2|x)$. The last step is to note that $Var(y|x) = Var(u|x)$ since $y=u+g(\mathbf{x}\beta)$ and the last term is constant wrt $\mathbf{x}$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.