I am asking a general question here. Can multi-nomial model be applied to aggregate data. If so , can you give me a reference list.
1 Answer
Yes, it can. Suppose we have a dataset on choices $j=1 \ldots J$. Each of the choices, let's say products, has observable characteristics $X_j$ and unobservable characteristics $\xi_j$. Using the typical formulation of a conditional logit, say that the utility of product $j$ to consumer $i$ is: \begin{align} U_{ij} = X_j\beta + \xi_j + \epsilon_{ij} \end{align} With the additional assumptions that $\epsilon_{ij}$ is iid Type I Extreme Value and that consumers each pick the choice with highest utility, you get: \begin{align} P_{ij} = \frac{exp(X_{j}\beta+\xi_j)}{\sum_{k}exp(X_{k}\beta+\xi_{k})} \end{align}
As for data, assume that, in addition to the $X_j$, we have the share of consumers, say, who choose each of these $s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_J$. Let's say that the number of consumers from which these shares were calculated was large enough that it's reasonable to view them as probabilities (i.e. to ignore sampling variation). Choose one of the shares/goods/choices to be a contrast (I'll pick 1), and write: \begin{align} ln(P_{ij})-ln(P_{i1}) &= (X_j-X_1)\beta + \xi_j - \xi_1\\~\\ ln(s_{j})-ln(s_{1}) &= \xi_1 + (X_j-X_1)\beta + \xi_j \end{align} The second of these two is the estimating equation. You construct the left-hand-side variable by taking logs of all the shares and then subtracting the log-share of choice 1 from the log-shares of each of the other goods. You calculate the RHS variables by taking each of the characteristics for each of the choices and subtracting off the value of the corresponding characteristic for choice 1. This gives you $J-1$ observations (you drop the contrast share's observation). The intercept in the equation is $\xi_1$. The error terms are the $\xi_j$. You can estimate via OLS.
The simple procedure I outline above has been known more-or-less since the 1960s.
This kind of model has been an active area of research in empirical Industrial
Organization for about twenty years now. Much, much richer and more complicated
models similar to this are now relatively easy to estimate.
To repeat, don't be put off by how simple and inflexible the model I write above is. You can have individual characteristics in the model. You can have interactions between individual characteristics and product/choice characteristics in the model. You can have endogenous variables in the model. You can have random coefficients. You can dispense with the iid Type I Extreme Value assumption. You can have a dynamic model. Etc. This kind of modelling has been a hot area in empirical IO for twenty years, now. There is a tool to do almost anything you want. And Matlab code available online for a lot of it.
You asked for cites. Read Berry (1994, Rand J) and Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995, Econometrica) first (called "bee ell pee" by approximately all empirical IO guys). Then use SSCI to go backwards and forwards in the published literature from this. If you want a textbook treatment, read Train's free online books/courses: One and Two. Also, Aviv Nevo has a guidebook here.
I see from your profile that you are at McGill. Normally, I would tell you to go talk to the empirical IO guy on your faculty, but I don't see an empirical IO guy on your faculty on a quick look.
-
1$\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. It's really straightforward. I have been reading quite a bit in terms of the discrete choice model but all using micro data. I just haven't thought how easy it would translate to aggregate data. And you are absolutely right. McGill does not have any one in empirical IO. We hired one this year though. I didn't give an example in the question. But I am working on the share of generic drugs in U.S states. Since you work in health economics, I thought it might interest you. $\endgroup$– Yan SongCommented Mar 17, 2015 at 18:21
-
1$\begingroup$ Yes, I'd be interested. Shoot me an email, and we can talk---I'm easy to find on the web. $\endgroup$– BillCommented Mar 17, 2015 at 18:47
-
$\begingroup$ @Bill Great answer! I wonder if you might have some suggestions for A nested logit with continuous dependent variables. $\endgroup$– AmstellCommented Sep 8, 2017 at 7:36
-
$\begingroup$ @Amstell I can't find the post you linked. Did you move it somewhere? $\endgroup$– BillCommented Sep 12, 2017 at 20:09
-
$\begingroup$ @Bill Sorry, yeah I deleted the question, but have since reopened it. I think I've found a solution, but would curious what you think. Try the link again. Appreciate the reply. $\endgroup$– AmstellCommented Sep 13, 2017 at 5:29