4
$\begingroup$

In the book An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling , Stochastic process is defined as :

A stochastic process is a family of random variable(s) , $X_t$ , where $t$ is a parameter running over a suitable index set, T.

If $T$ is not a random variable rather an index set , how can be $t$ a parameter ?

Isn't time series a stochastic process ? But there we say $t$ is an index and $X_t$ is an outcome at time point $t$ .

Then why should we telling $t$ a parameter in the definition of stochastic process ?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Parameters in a statistical sense are not realizations of a random variable:

A statistical parameter is a parameter that indexes a family of probability distributions. It can be regarded as a numerical characteristic of a population or a statistical model.

So $T$ will simply be some parameter space (for stochastic processes typically an interval in $\mathbb{R}$).


Usually, a statistician's first association on reading the word "parameter" is to want to estimate and/or do inference on them, for instance

  • for the mean or variance of a normal distribution we have sampled from (the parameter space is $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}_{>0}$)
  • or for regression coefficients (the parameter space is $\mathbb{R}^{p+1}$ if you have $p$ regressors and an intercept).

However, it does not need to be the case that we necessarily should want to estimate or do inference. I have a hard time imagining a use case where we would like to estimate the time $t\in T$ on which observations in a stochastic process were sampled. However, you do have a somewhat similar question in dealing with mixture models, where you do think about deducing which of multiple component densities a particular observation came from (although I still have never seen anyone do inference on this - usually you just try to understand the entire mixture).

In any case, the $t\in T$ does satisfy the condition of "indexing a family of probability distributions", namely the $X_t$, and so it is a bona fide parameter. Of course each $X_t$ may have additional parameters that we do want to estimate or infer, e.g., in (G)ARCH modeling.

(Incidentally, in stochastic processes, $X_t$ usually denotes a random variable, namely the process at time $t$, rather than an outcome at time $t$ - it sounds a bit like you are conflating the two.)

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The term parameter can different meanings in different settings. In statistics it is a usually a property of random variable which we want to estimate. In mathematics it is a simply a property of a mathematical object which is not constant. The stochastic processes literature usually follows mathematical conventions, so saying that $t$ is a parameter is perfectly fine.

The terminology is loosely related to terminology in calculus. When $t$ is a whole number we label it index, but when it is real number, i.e. continuous, we say parameter.

The beauty of stochastic process definition is that index set $T$ can be really anything. As long as finite dimensional distribution of a process satisfy conditions of Kolmogorov's theorem, $\{X_t, t\in T\}$ is an existing mathematical object. The parameter $t$ can be a natural number, a real number, a vector, or a set.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.