I know for the additive autoregressive model the stationary distribution of $\{X_t\}$ can be found, if it exists, in the following way: \begin{align} X_t &= \alpha X_{t-1} + \epsilon_t\\ \Rightarrow X_t &= (1-\alpha B)^{-1} \epsilon_t \\ &= \epsilon_t + \alpha \epsilon_{t-1} + \cdots. [\text{if}~ -1<\alpha<1] \end{align} Now if $e_t \stackrel{\text{iid}}{\thicksim} N(0, 1)$, say, one can easily find the distribution of $X_t$.

My question: What will be the stationary distribution, if it exists, of the multiplicative autoregressive model $X_t = \alpha X_{t-1}\epsilon_t$ ? What will be the condition(s) of $\alpha$ in this case? It will also be helpful if some hints are suggested to how it can be generalized to the higher order models.

  • $\begingroup$ Are you sure you want that form? This would look like a bilinear model if $\epsilon_t$ was lagged more, and you had a nonlagged $\epsilon_t$ by itself $\endgroup$ – Taylor Apr 30 '18 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. That is my model of interest. I do not have any prior knowledge of the stationary distributions of such models. So the possibility of the non-existence of stationary distribution remains. You can prove, if possible, that the stationary distribution of the stated model does not exist for any choices of the distribution (normal, Cauchy) of errors. $\endgroup$ – Shanks Apr 30 '18 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ yeah, it's strange. Under certain conditions $\operatorname{Var}(X_t) = \alpha^2 \operatorname{Var}(X_{t-1})$ which only holds if $\alpha=1$, getting rid of (possibly) the only parameter. $\endgroup$ – Taylor Apr 30 '18 at 18:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.